Council services by letter

Issue - meetings

||

Scrutiny Review of Youth Violence - Final Report

Meeting: 20/06/2019 - Cabinet (Item 190)

190 Scrutiny Review into Preventing Youth Violence pdf icon PDF 160 KB

Reference from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)          the reference from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee be received and noted;

 

(2)          a response report to the recommendations of the Review Group be submitted by the relevant Directorate(s) to the July 2019 Cabinet meeting;

 

(3)          the Chair of the Review Group and an opposition Member of the Review Group be invited to present the findings in accordance with the Cabinet/Scrutiny Protocol.

 

Reason for Decision:  To receive and request a response for Cabinet’s consideration in accordance with the Council’s Constitution.

 

Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:  As set out in the report.

 

Conflict of Interest relating to the matter declared by Cabinet Member/Dispensation Granted:  None.


Meeting: 04/06/2019 - Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Item 69)

69 Scrutiny Review into Preventing Youth Violence pdf icon PDF 129 KB

Report of the Director of Strategy.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee received a report of the Director of Strategy, which set out the final findings and recommendations of the Scrutiny Review into Preventing Youth Violence, which had been established to scrutinise the Council’s work into tackling youth violence.  The purpose of the review had been to investigate how the Council might use all of its policies and strategies to contribute to reducing youth crime and anti-social behaviour in a more ‘Public Health approach’ to Youth Crime.

The Chair of the Review Group introduced the report and made the following amendments to the report:

 

-               page 1 – to include ‘Councillors Camilla Bath and Maxine Henson’ who were had been Members of the Review Group;

 

-               page 20, first paragraph commencing ‘Officers said that they have lunch at the Helix ..’  – to delete reference to ‘those children were from the Helix’;

 

-               page 34, last paragraph commencing ‘In addition to this, last year,  The Helix …’ – to delete reference to ‘the Afro-Caribbean community, due to the statistics that supported that largely this sort of crime was perpetrated by the Afro-Caribbean community’ and replace it with ‘certain groups in the community’.

 

The Chair of the Review Group introduced the report from the Preventing Youth Violence Scrutiny Panel and referred to her ‘Foreword’.  She highlighted the following points:

 

-               recognition was needed that young people were individuals and ought to be treated as such;

 

-               the positive work into preventing youth violence in Harrow had exceeded her expectations and that, during the review, the message coming through from young people was that they wanted ‘something to do’ and it was therefore important that facilities were provided to allow them to engage in activities.  She cited the example of Wealdstone Centre which provided various facilities to help engage young people;

 

-               young people who had engaged in the review had been shocked to learn of the consequences of crime and how it could impact on their future.  It was important that information and consequences of crime were also conveyed to primary school children.  A strategy setting out information on where and how to get help and who young people could talk to was essential.  Children would face both good and bad choices and required guidance. 

 

The Chair of the Review Group responded to questions from Members of the Committee as follows:

 

-               it was important to engage with primary school children.  She was disappointed that a number of national initiatives to engage with young people had stopped, such as the Junior Olympics and the work that Claire Ginger from the police had done with young people.  Harrow Schools had stopped the latter as a result of pressures on funding.  She had asked the Safer Neighbourhood Harrow  Board to identify resources and provide material such as books that other boroughs had provided.  She referred to two books, one provided by Islington Council which had been sponsored by the Arsenal Football Club.  She outlined the contents of the book which had  ...  view the full minutes text for item 69